![]() And Nreal Light's AR potential proved to be low.Ĭheck your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription. Hololens 2 represents only an iterative improvement, in some cases even a deterioration, over its predecessor. Yes, the technology has gotten better, but it's nowhere near as good as once promised.Įven stripping out Magic Leap's troubled past, little has happened since 2017 to give reason to believe we'll soon get to don sleek, high-tech AR glasses that revolutionize work and everyday life. Longtime XR reporter Lucas Matney, who recently got to try Magic Leap 2, agrees. Soberly, the AR market has stagnated since Magic Leap 1 was unveiled five years ago. The burden of proof lies with the manufacturers, who have been hyping the technology for a decade. The question is whether this can already be the breakthrough and AR glasses become interesting for consumers or whether there must first be further fundamental improvements in the form factor and software. This would make the AR glasses quite close to the immersion of VR headsets. ![]() But the field of view is said to be significantly larger than its predecessor, and according to Chief Technology Officer Julie Larson-Green, Magic Leap 3 could double the field of view another time. What use is the most advanced AR technology if holograms only appear within a narrow window and are cropped from all sides?Įven the Magic Leap 2 only reduces this problem and does not eliminate it. The field of view is still the Achilles heel of Magic Leap 2 and AR glasses in general. However, the expectations of the press are significantly lower than for the completely overhyped predecessor. The new AR headset offered an excellent picture, a slimmer shape and, especially important, a significantly larger field of view. Last week, the first hands-on reports of the Magic Leap 2 appeared, and the conclusion was positive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |